<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lucis</title>
	<link>http://lucis.net</link>
	<description>computers, graphics, movies, books, photography, life, universe and everything</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Goodbye, Minolta</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/31/goodbye-minolta/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/31/goodbye-minolta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>photography</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/31/goodbye-minolta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is officially the last day that Konica Minolta is in the camera (selling) business. Tomorrow (April 1st) it all goes over to Sony. I started using Minolta just over three months ago. In the last three months I have acquired three Minolta camera bodies and about a dozen lenses ranging from plastic toys (28-100mm) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is officially the last day that Konica Minolta is in the camera (selling) business. Tomorrow (April 1st) it all goes over to Sony. I started using Minolta just over three months ago. In the last three months I have acquired three Minolta camera bodies and about a dozen lenses ranging from plastic toys (28-100mm) to perhaps what is the best lens ever produced by any lens manufacturer (the 200mm G lens). Today I feel as much a part of the Minolta-family as people who have been die-hard fans for over thirty years.<br />
As I keep saying, the most popular (Canon or Nikon in this case) is rarely the best. Minolta consistently had better cameras (the design of the Maxxum 7 puts cameras in higher segments by other manufacturers to shame), newer technology (Autofocus, Anti-shake), better glass, and was perhaps the only camera company that wasnt afraid to innovate radically. What they lacked was good marketing strategy and advertising revenues. It is really sad when true innovators like Minolta go down like this.</p>
<p>The various forums devoted to Minolta have been quite emotional the last few months. Ranging from wild rumors of how Sony is going to ruin everything to truly sincere &#8220;thank-you&#8217;s&#8221; to the various people working at Minolta who are going to be without a job tomorrow. I just saw this post by an ex-Minolta employee on <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1035&#038;thread=17837436">dpreview</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you don&#8217;t know who Mr Kusumoto is well he&#8217;s the man who came from Japan many years ago with two suitcases full of Minolta cameras and started it all for Minolta. He was talking with the manager about something. When he was done about four of us techs who have been here a long long time watch him glance at us for an instant as he walked towards the door. He turned around and stared at us. In the most humblest words he said &#8220;I am so sorry&#8221;. He is a most honorable man. He made this company great! It was great working for someone who really cared about his employees and his customers. I walked over and extended my hand. He did the same. I thanked him and that&#8217;s all I could say without getting too choked up. Next tech did the same and so on. Sorry if this is a bummer but It is an end of an era. - Xtech</p></blockquote>
<p>Tomorrow is a new day. Sony is in an amazing position to take over the DSLR market by storm. But Sony being Sony, they are just as likely to ruin everything just like they did with the Walkman. I doubt they will make any new announcement before May/June. Its going to be a long wait&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/31/goodbye-minolta/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>hard, harder, hardest, notpron!</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/19/notpron/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/19/notpron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>etcetera</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/19/notpron/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, first a disclaimer. You are going to hate me for doing this to you (just as I can never forgive Debasish). You will spend sleepless nights staring at the computer screen and scribbling on paper, you&#8217;ll be thinking of this when you work, sleep or eat, and your entire life will revolve around this. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, first a disclaimer. You are going to <em>hate</em> me for doing this to you (just as I can never forgive <a href="http://mainsamayhoon.blogspot.com/">Debasish</a>). You will spend sleepless nights staring at the computer screen and scribbling on paper, you&#8217;ll be thinking of this when you work, sleep or eat, and your entire life will revolve around this. So if you want to continue living the normal, sane, boring life you are used to, STOP READING NOW!</p>
<p>Good (I knew you&#8217;ll continue reading), with that out of the way, let me introduce you to <a href="http://www.deathball.net/notpron/">notpron</a>. The self proclaimed &#8220;hardest riddle available on the internet&#8221;  is not only the hardest, it is also the most addictive, interesting, and clever. It has 138 levels (so far), and each one of these can take days to solve. The riddles involve interesting computer tricks, math tricks, google searching, html tricks, and just about anything you can think of. I am currently stuck at level 16. It is very frustrating because I <em>think</em> I have decoded all the clues, but cant figure out how to put everything together so that I can unlock the next level.</p>
<p>So if you believe you can think laterally, and fancy your computer, math or searching skills, give it a shot. You&#8217;ll never forgive me <img src='http://lucis.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/19/notpron/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battlestar Galactica</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/12/battlestar-galactica/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/12/battlestar-galactica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>movies</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/12/battlestar-galactica/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BSG is without doubt one of the best shows on TV ever created. This fact was made ever more obvious in the 90 minute Season 2 finale. Wow! What can I say about this episode. Very rarely have I been so impressed by a single episode of any show (maybe a couple of the X-files [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/">BSG</a> is without doubt one of the best shows on TV <em>ever</em> created. This fact was made ever more obvious in the 90 minute Season 2 finale. Wow! What can I say about this episode. Very rarely have I been so impressed by a single episode of any show (maybe a couple of the X-files or Band of Brothers). This was one of the most boldest and unexpected moves by the series creators. Without giving up any spoilers, all I can say is that this episode throws the entire series wide open, and in some senses means starting from scratch with an almost completely new story line. This bold step might eventually cost the series a lot (many people will hate the changes!), and I applaud everyone behind the show for not taking the easy way out. Bravo BSG, you&#8217;ve just outdone yourself and more than made up for the 2-3 mediocre episodes in the second half of Season 2.</p>
<p>If you have never heard of BSG, and are even mildly interested in science fiction (or even if you are not), give the <a href="http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/mini/">miniseries</a> a shot to see if you like it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/12/battlestar-galactica/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic DMC-L1</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/01/panasonic-dmc-l1/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/01/panasonic-dmc-l1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>photography</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/01/panasonic-dmc-l1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always been a little skeptical of the four-thirds system mainly because if the lack of cheap and high quality Olympus lenses. Inspite of everyone and their dog predicting the death of the system soon, Olympus and Panasonic seem to be the only companies that are even trying to innovate with digital SLRs these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="8" align="left" src="http://lucis.net/stuff/images/panasonic_l1.jpg" />I have always been a little skeptical of the <a href="http://www.four-thirds.org/en/index.html">four-thirds system</a> mainly because if the lack of cheap and high quality Olympus lenses. Inspite of everyone and their dog predicting the death of the system soon, Olympus and Panasonic seem to be the only companies that are even trying to innovate with digital SLRs these days. And this in times when all the big-shots (Nikon and Canon) are doing is increasing the size of the LCDs on their cameras!. First the radical <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/articles/olympuse330/">Olumpus E330</a>, and now the new <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022609panasonicdmcl1.asp">Panasonic DMC-L1</a> can both be viewed as trend-setters in the industry. More on the Panasonic <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022801panasonicdmcl1handson.asp">here</a>.</p>
<p>With the death of Minolta, and the future uncertain with Sony, it is good to see atleast one camera company has the right idea. The new Panasonic has a dedicated shutter speed knob (when was the last time you saw one on a new camera!?), and even has a functional aperture ring! To top it all off, Leica announced support for the four-thirds system with their new 14-50 mm lens with image stabilization. If the camera+lens is reasonably priced (instead of the snobish Leica price), this is sure to be a killer camera.</p>
<p>Cant wait for Sony&#8217;s announcement on their new camera and lens lineup. I only hope they keep the Minolta design, ergonomics and glass and improve it in Minolta spirit, instead of Sony-izing everything&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/03/01/panasonic-dmc-l1/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Online Photographer</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/02/24/the-online-photographer/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/02/24/the-online-photographer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>photography</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2006/02/24/the-online-photographer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is probably the only blog I religiously read every day. Not only does it have a nice review of the latest photography/camera news, it also has interesting articles and mini-reviews well worth a read. Highly recommended for anyone interested in photography.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/">This</a> is probably the only blog I religiously read every day. Not only does it have a nice review of the latest photography/camera news, it also has interesting articles and mini-reviews well worth a read. Highly recommended for anyone interested in photography.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/02/24/the-online-photographer/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whitebalance on pictures at timesofindia.com</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/28/whitebalance-on-pictures-at-timesofindiacom/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/28/whitebalance-on-pictures-at-timesofindiacom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>computers</category>
	<category>india</category>
	<category>photography</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/28/whitebalance-on-pictures-at-timesofindiacom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few weeks the homepage of Times of India has been posting picutures of hollywood and (sometimes) Indian celebrities. The pictures go with some absolutely ridiculous piece of news under them (such as, some one famous brushed her teeth today). What really bugs me with these photos is that about 9 out of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few weeks the homepage of <a href="http://www.timesofindia.com">Times of India</a> has been posting picutures of hollywood and (sometimes) Indian celebrities. The pictures go with some absolutely ridiculous piece of news under them (such as, some one famous brushed her teeth today). What really bugs me with these photos is that about 9 out of 10 times the whitebalance on them is WAY off. The skin tones are horribly wrong, and there is either a greenish, or a bluish, or a yellow cast to the whole picture. I am amazed as to how a newspaper the size of ToI can let such a thing get by for so long. Tells you the state quality control with Indian websites&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/28/whitebalance-on-pictures-at-timesofindiacom/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sad day for the camera industry</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/19/sad-day-for-the-camera-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/19/sad-day-for-the-camera-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>photography</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/19/sad-day-for-the-camera-industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Konica Minolta announced today that they are withdrawing from the camera and photo business. One of the most innovative and creative camera company is coming to an end. Luckily the Maxxum mount will live under the Sony name. As much as I would hate to carry a Sony camera, this is good news since it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minolta">Konica Minolta</a> announced today that they are withdrawing from the camera and photo business. One of the most innovative and creative camera company is coming to an end. Luckily the Maxxum mount will live under the Sony name. As much as I would hate to carry a Sony camera, this is good news since it means my investment of A-mount lenses would eventually be worth a lot more. Also the bottom line is that my KM 5D will continue to take the same great pictures, and I have no intentions of replacing it for a couple of years at least. Time to pile up some more lenses while people are still dumping them for peanuts on ebay!</p>
<p>For those unaware about Minolta&#8217;s heritage, <a href="http://www.photoxels.com/history_minolta.html">here</a> is a brief history. Minolta was the first company to introduce an Autofocus SLR, wireless flash, first (and till date the only) to incorporate anti-shake in the camera body, and a bunch of other firsts. It was perhaps the only company that actually put some thought into the camera user interface. Nikon is really quite bad, and Canon just downright pathetic in terms of the user interface on SLRs. As long as Sony doesnt try to impose its &#8220;memory-stick culture&#8221; on these cameras, there is bright future ahead for the Maxxum/Dynax mount. Now if only they would make a formal announcement on what their plans are, it would silence a lot of speculation and fear on various forums.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: A day after the announcement the dust is starting to settle and more information is slowly coming out. According to Sony, they are aiming at a <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=technologyNews&#038;storyID=2006-01-20T102922Z_01_T211357_RTRUKOC_0_US-JAPAN-SONY.xml">25% share of the DSLR market</a>. Also, ebay prices for Minolta lenses is already starting to rise. I saw an old <a href="http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/reviews/minolta100200.htm">Minolta 100-200mm/4.5</a> lens (good but not great) go for around $80! Just last week I almost bought one for under $30! I knew I should have gotten more lenses earlier :p
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2006/01/19/sad-day-for-the-camera-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KDE and amarocK</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/31/kde-and-amarock/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/31/kde-and-amarock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>computers</category>
	<category>linux</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/31/kde-and-amarock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve used gnome as my default desktop for the better part of the last three years. Why? Because it &#8220;looked&#8221; better than KDE back when I tried them both. KDE was a tad faster, but everyone wants some eye candy! But it looks like KDE has come a long way. This post has convinced me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used gnome as my default desktop for the better part of the last three years. Why? Because it &#8220;looked&#8221; better than KDE back when I tried them both. KDE was a tad faster, but everyone wants some eye candy! But it looks like KDE has come a long way. <a href="http://www.terra.es/personal/diegocg/kde/">This post</a> has convinced me to give KDE another spin. Of all the things mentioned, I think <a href="http://amarok.kde.org/">amarocK</a> looks the most impressive. A serious iTunes replacement? We&#8217;ll see&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/31/kde-and-amarock/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>smugmug vs flickr vs pbase vs &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/27/smugmug-vs-flickr-vs-pbase-vs/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/27/smugmug-vs-flickr-vs-pbase-vs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>computers</category>
	<category>photography</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/27/smugmug-vs-flickr-vs-pbase-vs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few days I&#8217;ve been trying to decide on a photo sharing website. flickr is extremely popular and the pro account has unlimited bandwidth and storage. It also has an amazing community with millions of cluncky but functional groups. However, I could never get myself to like the flickr user interface. Sure, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="5" align="right" alt="leaves on stairs" title="leaves on stairs" src="http://ankit.smugmug.com/photos/49833730-S.jpg" />Over the past few days I&#8217;ve been trying to decide on a photo sharing website. <a href="http://flickr.com">flickr</a> is extremely popular and the pro account has unlimited bandwidth and storage. It also has an amazing community with millions of cluncky but functional groups. However, I could never get myself to like the flickr user interface. Sure, there are quite a few intelligent features, but for the most part the UI is simply unusable. The amount of whitespace wasted on each page is absolutely ridiculous. The slideshow feature is really a joke (who would want a slideshow in a tiny part of the window!?). I even setup a <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/ankzap/">flickr account</a> for myself, but never really uploaded much.</p>
<p><a href="http://pbase.com">pbase</a> was one of the very first photo sharing sites on the net. It has some really cool features like searching the camera/lens database. Unfortunately the interface is somewhat antiquated (though very flexible), and they offer very little storage space.</p>
<p>And then there is <a href="http://smugmug.com">smugmug</a>. It has the best UI by far (though not very configurable for the standard account). They offer unlimited storage and a generous bandwidth cap per month. They have a fairly decent API for third party apps (though not as popular as flickr). Nice full screen slideshows, print ordering, and the option to upgrade to a power user for a highly customizable look are added benifits. The only thing that really goes against smugmug is the lack of a real photo-sharing community like flickr.</p>
<p>So, I was really jumping between smugmug and flickr and finding it hard to decide until I came across <a href="http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=24847">this</a> thread on their smugmug&#8217;s support forum. This guy basically wants to upload 2+ terabytes worth of images, and is wondering if smugmug can handle this. Here is the response that he got from those incharge:</p>
<blockquote><p>Wow, that must be close to 500,000 JPEGs!  Quite a collection -  I can&#8217;t wait to see them.  <img src='http://lucis.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So we&#8217;ve always said &#8220;unlimited storage&#8221; and we mean what we say. We&#8217;re happy to take your photos and host them, but we need a little time to prepare.</p>
<p>Just so you know, this is something like a $20,000 first-year commitment for us in terms of disk space, power, cooling, and physical space. You&#8217;ll basically have two complete RAID arrays to yourself in our datacenter. Of course, you&#8217;ll only pay your $30, $50, or $100 per year, depending on your account level. Again, we&#8217;re happy to do it - but I want to be up front here and let you know that we need to order some equipment and get it installed to accept your photos. We&#8217;re not geared for accepting 2.5TB overnight. <img src='http://lucis.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll also be buying extra image processing machines just for your batch of photos. Luckily, once yours are done, everyone else at smugmug will get to benefit from them, so I don&#8217;t consider that a cost to host you.</p>
<p>Does that sound fair?  Can we ask you to hold off while we order and install the equipment and power required?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Don</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow! This is called customer service. I immediatelly signed up for a standard account at smugmug <img src='http://lucis.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://ankit.smugmug.com">Here</a> is my smugmug webpage. I&#8217;ll be adding pictures and organizing it in the coming weeks. Will also post links here, and hopefully have something like a photoblog that is linked to smugmug soon.</p>
<p>Finally, if you do decide to go with smugmug, use this referrer code while signing up <strong>MwBAowRs6Oiis</strong> - it will save you $5, and give this poor graduate student a $10 credit towards next year&#8217;s service.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/27/smugmug-vs-flickr-vs-pbase-vs/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m back&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/26/im-back/</link>
		<comments>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/26/im-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		
	<category>etcetera</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucis.net/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; or am I? Its been a long time since I wrote anything here. Have lots of stuff to add and lots of pictures to share. I hope I&#8217;ll try to update this more often. Meanwhile, upgraded WP to the latest version - was really straightforward.
To get started, here is a nice little twenty minute [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; or am I? Its been a long time since I wrote anything here. Have lots of stuff to add and lots of pictures to share. I hope I&#8217;ll try to update this more often. Meanwhile, upgraded WP to the latest version - was really straightforward.</p>
<p>To get started, <a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewTVSeason?id=110899839&#038;s=143441">here</a> is a nice little twenty minute special on the best TV serial on air - <a href="http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/">Battlestar Galactica</a>. Its not much, but atleast something to chew on while we wait for the rest of the second season.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://lucis.net/archives/2005/12/26/im-back/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
